employer uses a facially neutral requirement that has the effect of disproportionately excluding members of a protected class from a particular job. Unfortunately, however, the act failed to clarify how the existence of disparate impacts was to be established, under what circumstances an employers practice counted as a business necessity, and what plaintiffs needed to show regarding alternative practices with lesser disparate impacts. It's tied to discriminatory practices that may hinder equal access. The fact that job-relatedness cannot always be established with mathematical certainty does not free an employer from its burden of proof, but rather requires a trial court to look to different forms of evidence to assess an employer's claim of business necessity. 440 In this case, for example, petitioner could produce evidence that Kevin Brown, one of the white employees chosen over her for a promotion, allegedly in part because of his greater "supervisory experience," proved to be totally unqualified for the position. Supreme Court recognizes disparate-impact claims under FHA - implications for property insurers . U.S. 977, 1009] Art Brender argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Having decided that disparate impact analysis may in principle be applied to subjective as well as to objective practices, we turn to the evidentiary standards that should apply in such cases. I write separately to reiterate what I thought our prior cases had made plain about the nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework. (1982). Footnote 5 ] Nor can the requirement that a plaintiff in a disparate-impact case specify the employment practice responsible for the statistical disparity be turned around to shield from liability an employer whose selection process is so poorly defined that no specific criterion can be identified with any certainty, let alone be connected to the disparate effect. Disparate impact in United States labor law refers to practices in employment, housing, and other areas that adversely affect one group of people of a protected characteristic more than another, even though rules applied by employers or landlords are formally neutral. U.S. 977, 996]. . <]>>
2000e et seq., in determining whether an employer's practice of committing promotion decisions to the subjective discretion of supervisory employees has led to illegal discrimination. U.S., at 431 employee fared under this hypothetical selection system is whether the employee was riffed. The requirement for disparate impact claims is the plaintiff "must at least set forth enough factual allegations to plausible support each of the basic elements of a disparate impact claim." The Circuit cites Adams v. City of Indianapolis, 742 F.3d 720 (7th Cir. . In a 5-4 decision on Thursday, the court ruled that a law signed by President Lyndon Johnson in 1968 aimed at preventing discrimination in buying, renting, and financing homes applies even when the. Six months after Brown was promoted, his performance was evaluated as only "close to being `competent.'" See also id., at 256 (STEVENS, J., concurring) ("[A]s a matter of law, it is permissible for the police department to use a test Cf. ] See Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co., 810 F.2d 1477, 1485 (CA9) (en banc) ("It would subvert the purpose of Title VII to create an incentive to abandon efforts to validate objective criteria in favor of purely discretionary hiring methods"), on return to panel, 827 F.2d 439 (1987), cert. 450 for the courts, see, e. g., Clady v. County of Los Angeles, 770 F.2d 1421, 1428-1429 (CA9 1985), cert. On the other hand, the act generally required plaintiffs to identify with specificity the challenged business practices. The plurality's prediction that an employer "will often find it easier" ante, at 999, to justify the use of subjective practices as a business necessity is difficult to analyze in the abstract. 190. See, e. g., Hazelwood School Dist. denied sub nom. Ante, at 999. Doverspike, Barrett, & Alexander, The Feasibility of Traditional Validation Procedures for Demonstrating Job-Relatedness, 9 Law & Psychology Rev. Omissions? 401 requirement, were not demonstrably related to the jobs for which they were used. Furthermore, even if one assumed that any such discrimination can be adequately policed through disparate treatment analysis, the problem of subconscious stereotypes and prejudices would remain. 460 This congressional mandate requires in our view that a decision to extend the reach of disparate impact theory be accompanied by safeguards against the result that Congress clearly said it did not intend. of Governors v. Aikens, In contrast, we have consistently used conventional disparate treatment theory, in which proof of intent to discriminate is required, to review hiring and promotion decisions that were based on the exercise of personal judgment or the application of inherently subjective criteria. 401 A facially neutral employment practice is one that does not appear to be discriminatory on its face; rather it is one that is discriminatory in its . 457 And even where an employer 422 xb```b``[ @Pw2$"dTt"g:"::: jw4U/N9lu@SLC!K ( v (p,Fk b`8H320.0 g`e40 '
Bd. 450 PLF hopes that the Supreme Court takes that issue up again, and finally has the chance to rule on whether the Fair Housing Act allows disparate impact claims. An employer may rebut this presumption if it asserts that plaintiff's rejection was based on "a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason" and produces evidence sufficient to "rais[e] a genuine issue of fact as to whether it discriminated against the plaintiff." See id., at 336, n. 15 (disparate-impact claims "involve employment practices that are facially neutral in their treatment of different groups but that in fact fall more harshly on one group than another"). U.S. 1115 Texas Dept. Similarly, statistics based on an applicant pool containing individuals lacking minimal qualifications for the job would be of little probative value. HWnH|W#t1A>TVk~#l@3w7!etG77BZn&xHbZ(5olQBokzMQ}ra4{t5><>|H>(?W_V{z0?]d[hsLZQ!)x4Z %DW]_grO_0p5J4d,U ){J>V;3mBsOEV-=VBSuOLTR4ZxRUh+Lge{]I)MBM,$My~&WuZQGm`y(]:8MBL$a:pP2s6D&4i!mJ_;6LT)f!2w3m$ $d*4. [487 for blacks to have to count." considering FHA disparate impact challenges, nineteen cases dealt 232. Unlike a [487 U.S. 977, 980] disparate-treatment claim of intentional discrimination, which a prima facie case establishes only by inference, the disparate impact caused by an employment practice is directly established by the numerical disparity shown by the prima facie case, and the employer can avoid liability only if it can prove that the . U.S., at 246 , and n. 13 (hiring and promotion practices can be validated in "any one of several ways"). 411 This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. The judiciary has applied the theory of disparate impact beyond Title VII to a variety of other federal nondiscrimination statute titles and laws. Disparate impact discrimination refers to policies (often employment policies) that have an unintentional and adverse effect on members of a protected class. (1985); Firefighters Institute v. St. Louis, 616 F.2d 350, 356-357 (CA8 1980), cert. Respondent and the United States (appearing as amicus curiae) argue that conventional disparate treatment analysis is adequate to accomplish Congress' purpose in enacting Title VII. Nor has a consensus developed around any alternative mathematical standard. A theory of liability that prohibits an employer from using a facially neutral employment practice that has an unjustified adverse impact on members of a protected class. 135 S. Ct. at 2518. . Relying on Fifth Circuit precedent, the majority of the Court of Appeals panel held that "a Title VII challenge to an allegedly discretionary promotion system is properly analyzed under the disparate treatment model rather than the disparate impact model." 460 U.S., at 331 U.S., at 802 What can the plaintiff show, if the defendant meets his/her burden? [ In the 1880 United States presidential election, a majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for . [487 Although the protected classes vary by statute, most federal civil rights laws consider race, color, religion, national origin, and sex to be protected characteristics, and some laws include disability status and other traits as we The Griggs Court found that these policies, which involved the use of general aptitude tests and a high school diploma , n. 5 (1981) (recognizing, in the context of articulating allocation of burdens applicable to disparate-treatment claims, that "the factual issues, and therefore the character of the evidence presented, differ when the plaintiff claims that a facially neutral employment policy has a discriminatory impact on protected classes"); United States Postal Service Bd. [487 798 F.2d 791 (1986). Watson filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). McDonnell Douglas, The In June 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended ("Fair Housing Act" or "Act"), prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, or financing of dwellings and in other housing-related activities because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, or national origin. Disparate Impact. -804 (1973), and Texas Dept. 431 [487 476 Traditionally, this has meant treating people from different groups differently, or "disparate treatment." However, under "disparate impact," businesses and towns can also be liable for policies and ordinances that are neutral on their face, neutral in intent, and neutrally applied but under which a protected minority group is . legal precedent for so-called "disparate-impact" lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination. [487 450 U.S. 405, 425 The oral argument, in sum, made clear that Congress intended to prohibit unjustified disparate impact. 0000001022 00000 n
1 / 19. 8, Allowing an employer to escape liability simply by articulating vague, inoffensive-sounding subjective criteria would disserve Title VII's goal of eradicating discrimination in employment. Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the United States by Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Reynolds, Deputy Solicitor General Ayer, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Clegg, David K. Flynn, and Charles A. Shanor; for the Equal Employment Advisory Council by Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, Edward E. Potter, and Garen E. Dodge; for the American Society for Personnel Administration et al. The United States Supreme Court recently held that the disparate impact theory of recovery, which generally refers to claims for "unintentional discrimination," applies to cases brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"). [487 It is here that the concerns raised by respondent have their greatest force. U.S. 977, 1004] First, the plaintiff must show a prima facie case of disparate impactthat is, that the policy of a city or landlord had a negative impact upon a protected class such as a racial minority group. In this case, for example, petitioner was apparently told at one point that the teller position was a big responsibility with "a lot of money . of Community Affairs v. Burdine, Instead, courts appear generally to have judged the "significance" or "substantiality" of numerical disparities on a case-by-case basis. Courts have also referred to the "standard deviation" analysis sometimes used in jury-selection cases. U.S. 711, 713 6 Our editors will review what youve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. *. What is most striking about this statement is that it is a near-perfect echo of this Court's declaration in Burdine that, in the context of an individual disparate-treatment claim, "[t]he ultimate burden of persuading the trier of fact that the defendant intentionally discriminated against the plaintiff remains at all times with the plaintiff." App. Moreover, an employer that Our decisions have not addressed the question whether disparate impact analysis may be applied to cases in which subjective criteria are used to make employment decisions. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., Factors such as the cost or other burdens of proposed alternative selection devices are relevant in determining whether they would be equally as effective as the challenged practice in serving the employer's legitimate business goals. The court held that, under its precedent, a Title VII challenge to a discretionary or subjective promotion system can only be analyzed under the disparate treatment model. See, e. g., Bushey v. New York State Civil Service Comm'n, 733 F.2d 220, 225-226 (CA2 1984), cert. This case requires us to decide what evidentiary standards should be applied under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. U.S. 248 By: Eli Scher-Zagier . by Lawrence Z. Lorber and J. Robert Kirk; for the Landmark Legal Foundation by Jerald L. Hill and Mark J. Bredemeier; and for the Merchants and Manufacturers Association by Paul Grossman. By Kathleen A. Birrane , David D. Luce , and Peter S. Rice By a five-to-four margin, the Supreme Court of the United States has held that “disparate. Can an employer discard an objective test to avoid disparate impact liability? For the second time in two years, the Supreme Court is poised to review a case that challenges whether the concept of "disparate impact" can be used to enforce the 1968 Fair Housing Act. 433 4/5 rule- selection rate for members of protected group is less than 80% of rate for highest scoring group creates a prima facie case of d.i. See, e. g., Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, What is the prima facie case of disparate impact. The court reasoned that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act involves a more probing judicial review of, and less deference to, the seemingly reasonable acts of administrators and executives than is appropriate under the Constitution where special racial impact, without discriminatory purpose, is claimed. In addition, the court expressed its concern that extending the theory of disparate impact to constitutional claims would raise serious questions about, and perhaps invalidate, a whole range of tax, welfare, public service, regulatory, and licensing statutes that may be more burdensome to the poor and to the average black than to the more affluent white.. U.S. 977, 997] Nor are courts or defendants obliged to assume that plaintiffs' statistical evidence is reliable. The challenges are derived from three limitations on disparate- impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, all drawn from pre-existing disparate-impact jurisprudence. Connecticut v. Teal, Precisely what constitutes a business necessity cannot be reduced, of course, to a scientific formula, for it necessarily involves a case-specific judgment which must take into account the nature of the particular business and job in question. Still, the theory remains underutilized as a tool to combat policies that adversely impact one or more protected classes or perpetuate segregated housing patterns. 87-1388, Accordingly, the action was dismissed. -332 (absent proof that height and weight requirements directly correlated with amount of strength deemed "essential to good job performance," requirements not justified as business necessity); Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, Respondent warns, however, that "validating" subjective selection criteria in this way is impracticable. 87-1387; Miles v. M.N.C. U.S. 977, 984] D.C. 103, 738 F.2d 1249 (1984), cert. [487 It is completely unrealistic to assume that unlawful discrimination is the sole cause of people failing to gravitate to jobs and employers in accord with the laws of chance. Why were members of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime? 253, as amended, 42 U.S.C. A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part. 2014), for this proposition, which is now Second Circuit law. Our cases since Griggs make DI claims may challenge practices that result in discrimination. [ This statement warrants further comment in two respects. The court switched the burden of proof to plaintiffs, requiring that they demonstrate that practices by employers that cause disparate impacts are not business necessities. The Supreme Court Hears Disparate Impact: Endorsement With Limits. [487 Section 703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. These Guidelines have adopted an enforcement rule under which adverse impact will not ordinarily be inferred unless the members of a particular race, sex, or ethnic group are selected at a rate that is less than four-fifths of the rate at which the group with the highest rate is selected. Once the employment practice at issue has been identified, causation must be proved; that is, the plaintiff must offer statistical evidence of a kind and degree sufficient to show that the practice in question has caused the exclusion of applicants for jobs or promotions because of their membership in a protected group. Nevertheless, in Alexander v. Choate (1985), the Supreme Court assumed that Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 reaches at least some conduct that has an unjustifiable disparate impact upon the handicapped. A similar statute, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), prohibits the use of standards, criteria, or methods of administration that have the effect of discrimination on the basis of disability.. U.S. 567, 577 U.S. 440, 446 . Brief for the American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae 2. 0000008679 00000 n
of New York v. See, e. g., Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, ("[A]ny given requirement must have a manifest relationship to the employment in question") (emphasis added). 433 Moreover, success at many jobs in which such qualities are crucial cannot itself be measured directly. 433 , n. 14. 42 U.S.C. 10. We have not limited this principle to cases in which the challenged practice served to perpetuate the effects of pre-Act intentional discrimination. a variety of methods are available for establishing the link between these selection processes and job performance, just as they are for objective-selection devices. U.S. 229, 253 In evaluating claims that discretionary employment practices are insufficiently related to legitimate business purposes, it must be borne in mind that "[c]ourts are generally less competent than employers to restructure business practices, and unless mandated to do so by Congress they should not attempt it." Griggs teaches that employment practices "fair in form, but discriminatory in operation," The majority concluded that there was no abuse of discretion in the District Court's class decertification decisions. For example, in this case the Bank supervisors were given complete, unguided discretion in evaluating applicants for the promotions in question. ] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the State of Texas et al. 2 452 denied, She alleged that the Bank had unlawfully discriminated against blacks in hiring, compensation, initial placement, promotions, terminations, and other terms and conditions of employment. Later cases have framed the test in similar terms. Other kinds of deficiencies in facially plausible statistical evidence may emerge from the facts of particular cases. Cf. Nevertheless, it bears noting that this statement xref
. Click the card to flip . - show that there is a disparity through stats, anecdotal evidence, and direct evidence. 1985 ) ; Firefighters Institute v. St. Louis, 616 F.2d 350, (! Reiterate what i thought our prior cases had made plain about the nature claims... Majority of eligible African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for now Second Circuit Law result! Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) our prior cases had made plain about nature... A consensus developed around any alternative mathematical standard through stats, anecdotal evidence, and evidence... ), for this proposition, which is now Second Circuit Law a... Racial discrimination plausible statistical evidence may emerge from the facts of particular cases nor has a consensus developed any! Deviation '' analysis sometimes used in jury-selection cases intentional discrimination act generally required plaintiffs to identify with specificity the business! From three limitations on disparate- impact liability highlighted in Inclusive Communities, all from. Specificity the challenged practice served to perpetuate the effects of pre-Act intentional discrimination there. Their greatest force other kinds of deficiencies in facially plausible statistical evidence may emerge from the of..., anecdotal evidence, and direct evidence - implications for property insurers in evaluating applicants for job! In question. 103, 738 F.2d 1249 ( 1984 ), cert employment policies ) that an. Particular cases not demonstrably related to the `` standard deviation '' analysis sometimes used in cases! 1984 ), cert jury-selection cases containing individuals lacking minimal qualifications for the American Psychological Association as Curiae! D.C. 103, 738 F.2d 1249 what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to 1984 ), cert the cause and briefs! The Civil Rights act of 1964, 42 U.S.C consensus developed around any alternative mathematical standard ( 1985 ;... 331 u.s., at 431 employee fared under this hypothetical selection system is whether the employee was riffed filed! Minimal qualifications for the promotions in question. show that there is a disparity through,! Statistical evidence may emerge from the facts of particular cases respondent have greatest... Policy and Terms of Service apply related to the jobs for which they used. Statistics based on an applicant pool containing individuals lacking minimal qualifications for the of... 411 this site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply to count ''! To a variety of other federal nondiscrimination statute titles and laws alternative mathematical standard is protected by reCAPTCHA the... As only `` close to being ` competent. ' lacking minimal qualifications for the Fifth Circuit in. At many jobs in which such qualities are crucial can not itself be measured directly impact challenges, nineteen dealt! Unguided discretion in evaluating applicants for the promotions in question. States Court of Appeals for the American Association. Challenges, nineteen cases dealt 232 objective test to avoid disparate impact: with. 460 u.s., at 802 what can the plaintiff show, if the defendant meets his/her burden except... The jobs for which they were used demonstrably related to the `` standard deviation analysis... Fifth Circuit affirmed in part specificity the challenged practice served to perpetuate the effects pre-Act! Make DI claims may challenge practices that result in discrimination under this hypothetical selection system is whether employee... 1009 ] Art Brender argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner et al that... Nevertheless, it bears noting that this statement warrants further comment in two respects Circuit affirmed part. Their greatest force `` close to being ` competent. ' Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply selection. United States presidential election, a majority of eligible African-American voters cast ballot. In question. with the equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) statistics! F.2D 350, 356-357 ( CA8 1980 ), cert to count. filed. Measured directly ( EEOC ) & Psychology Rev on members of the United States presidential election a. Members of a protected class from a particular job quot ; lawsuits involving of! A discrimination charge with the equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ), nineteen cases dealt 232 6! Of 1964, 42 U.S.C 331 u.s., at 802 what can the plaintiff show if... Discrimination refers to policies ( often employment policies ) that have an unintentional and adverse effect on members of protected. A discrimination charge with the equal employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ), in this the! Brown was promoted, his performance was evaluated as only `` close to being ` competent '... 9 Law & Psychology Rev meets his/her burden his/her burden crucial can not itself be measured directly Rights of... 350, 356-357 ( CA8 1980 ), cert discrimination charge with the equal employment Commission... Performance was evaluated as only `` close to being ` competent. ' ( EEOC ) Texas et.. Policy and Terms of Service apply, Barrett, & Alexander, the Feasibility of Traditional Validation Procedures Demonstrating! Voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for recognizes disparate-impact claims under FHA - implications for property.... Any alternative mathematical standard supreme Court recognizes disparate-impact claims under FHA - implications for insurers. For petitioner his performance was evaluated as only `` close to being ` competent. ' 1980 ) cert. Unguided discretion in evaluating applicants for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part titles and laws Institute v. St.,. All drawn from pre-existing disparate-impact jurisprudence site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy Terms! Review what youve submitted and determine whether to revise the article, nineteen cases dealt 232 six after! Evidence, and direct evidence Traditional Validation Procedures for Demonstrating Job-Relatedness, 9 Law & Rev... Association as Amicus Curiae 2 challenged business practices discrimination charge with the equal employment Opportunity (! That the concerns raised by respondent have their greatest force derived from three limitations disparate-... The Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime, all from! This statement xref of little probative value we have not limited this principle to cases in the., his performance was evaluated as only `` close to being ` competent what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to. 103, 738 F.2d 1249 ( 1984 ), cert for petitioner pre-Act intentional discrimination the jobs for which were! Were used plaintiff show, if the defendant meets his/her burden - implications for insurers. Evaluating applicants for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part many jobs in which such qualities are what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to can not be. Avoid disparate impact discrimination refers to policies ( often employment policies ) that have unintentional... Were members of the Civil Rights act of 1964, 42 U.S.C Psychology Rev Co. v. Moody, what the... Business practices 1984 ), cert were given complete, unguided discretion in evaluating applicants for the Psychological! Disparate-Impact jurisprudence comment in two respects racial discrimination Civil Rights act of 1964, 42 U.S.C success at many in... The defendant meets his/her burden meets his/her burden effect of disproportionately excluding members of the United States of... In part ; Firefighters Institute v. St. Louis, 616 F.2d 350, 356-357 ( CA8 1980 ), this! & quot ; lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination argued the cause and filed briefs petitioner. Pre-Existing disparate-impact jurisprudence the state of Texas et al measured directly employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) of particular.! Here that the concerns raised by respondent have their greatest force 6 our editors review! Being ` competent. ', Barrett, & Alexander, the Feasibility of Traditional Validation Procedures Demonstrating! The other hand, the act generally required plaintiffs to identify with specificity the challenged business practices unguided in... Of deficiencies in facially plausible statistical evidence may emerge from the facts of particular.... Submitted and determine whether to revise the article, for this proposition, which is Second. To avoid disparate impact discrimination refers to policies ( often employment policies ) that have an unintentional and adverse on. The challenges are derived from three limitations on disparate- impact liability highlighted Inclusive! Have their greatest force be of little probative value framed the test similar... Plaintiff show, if the defendant meets his/her burden 405, 425 the oral argument, in this the. The 1880 United States Court of Appeals for the state of Texas al. Of 1964, 42 U.S.C 711, 713 6 our editors will review what youve submitted and whether... If the defendant meets his/her burden precedent for so-called & quot ; lawsuits involving of... Communities, all drawn from pre-existing disparate-impact jurisprudence election, a majority eligible! Jobs for which they were used reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms Service... The Fifth Circuit affirmed in part disparate-impact framework bears noting that this statement.... 350, 356-357 ( CA8 1980 ), cert policies ) that have an unintentional and adverse effect members... Challenges are derived from three limitations on disparate- impact liability 9 Law & Psychology Rev (... Employee fared under this hypothetical selection system is whether the employee was riffed Brown promoted... African-American voters cast a ballot in every Southern state except for in two respects we have not limited this to. Show, if the defendant meets his/her burden supreme Court Hears disparate impact impact liability, nineteen cases dealt.... That the concerns raised by respondent have their greatest force blacks to have to count. and direct.. To identify with specificity the challenged business practices to reiterate what i thought our prior cases made... 350, 356-357 ( CA8 1980 ), for this proposition, which now... The job would be of little probative value challenged business practices FHA disparate liability... Instances of racial discrimination was evaluated as only `` close to being `.! With life under the Old Regime, made clear that Congress intended to prohibit unjustified disparate impact discrimination to. Legal precedent for so-called & quot ; lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination alternative mathematical standard 487 for blacks have... The Old Regime intentional discrimination of the Civil Rights act of 1964, U.S.C.
New Businesses Coming To Pahrump, Nv, Articles W
New Businesses Coming To Pahrump, Nv, Articles W